[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5cb8b7bc-df6f-8744-b345-4762f2435201@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 23:03:44 +0530
From: Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: steve.capper@...aro.org, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
vijaya.kumar@...iumnetworks.com, will.deacon@....com,
oleg@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wcohen@...hat.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/6] ARM64: Uprobe support added
On Monday 07 November 2016 05:09 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c
>> > b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c
>> > index 8a29d29..6bf6657 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c
>> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c
>> > @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
>> > #include <linux/kprobes.h>
>> > #include <linux/module.h>
>> > #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
>> > -#include <asm/kprobes.h>
>> > #include <asm/insn.h>
>> > #include <asm/sections.h>
>> >
>> > So, do you want me to send V4 or a separate topup fixup patch. Please let me
>> > know, will do accordingly.
> Just a separate patch on top of your series would do. Also please test
> your series with CONFIG_KPROBE disabled and I assume this wasn't done
> (just in case there is an interaction we were not aware of).
OK, I tested by disabling CONFIG_KPROBE, and uprobe tests worked fine.
~Pratyush
Powered by blists - more mailing lists