lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F3A22720B@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:48:46 +0000
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     linux-edac <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86/MCE: Remove MCP_TIMESTAMP

> So, get rid of all that and simply log an MCE with a TSC value always.
> Simplifies the code a bit too.

I'm not necessarily opposed to this ... but there was once some logic behind when
logged TSC, and when we didn't.  Essentially we wanted the TSC when we were
logging from #CMCI or #MC .... because the detection of the error was fresh, and
wanted as much precision on the logged time as possible to compare with logged
errors from other banks/cpus. This might allow us to distinguish multiple errors logged
in the same #CMCI, from errors logged in separate #CMCI a tenth of a second apart.

If we found the error while polling, we didn’t want to provide a false sense of precision.
The error could have been logged up to five minutes previously (or when logging
errors during the initial poll of the banks an arbitrary time in the past).

-Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ