[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F3A22728C@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 18:37:50 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: linux-edac <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86/MCE: Remove MCP_TIMESTAMP
> One other possibility would be to use ->time and write ->tsc *only*
> when exact - i.e., in the handler - and this is then enough info about
> timing.
>
> ->time will give you somewhere around where it happened and ->tsc - only
> if set - will give you exact, well, *timestamp* :)
>
> This sounds like a pretty straightforward logic to me...
Also to me ... and I think that's what used to happen (or at least was the
intent).
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists