| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20161107061234.GD21030@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:42:34 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Resend][PATCH] cpufreq: conservative: Decrease frequency faster
when the timer deferred
For the record, I have never got the original mail with this subject.
On 06-11-16, 11:19, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> Conservative governor changes the CPU frequency in steps.
> That means that if a CPU runs at max frequency, it will need several
> sampling periods to return at min frequency when the workload
> is finished.
>
> If the timer that calculates the load and target frequency is deferred,
> the governor might need even more time to decrease the frequency.
>
> This may have impact to power consumption and after all conservative
> should decrease the frequency if there is no workload every sampling
> rate.
>
> To resolve the above issue calculate the number of sampling periods
> that the timer deferred. Considering that for each sampling period
> conservative should drop the frequency by a freq_step because the
> CPU was idle apply the proper subtraction to requested frequency.
>
> Below, the kernel trace with and without this patch. First an
> intensive workload is applied on a specific CPU. Then the workload
> is removed and the CPU goes to idle.
>
> WITHOUT
> -------
> <idle>-0 [007] dN.. 620.329153: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-556 [007] .... 620.350857: cpu_frequency: state=1700000 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-556 [007] .... 620.370856: cpu_frequency: state=1900000 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-556 [007] .... 620.390854: cpu_frequency: state=2100000 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-556 [007] .... 620.411853: cpu_frequency: state=2200000 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-556 [007] .... 620.432854: cpu_frequency: state=2400000 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-556 [007] .... 620.453854: cpu_frequency: state=2600000 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-556 [007] .... 620.494856: cpu_frequency: state=2900000 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-556 [007] .... 620.515856: cpu_frequency: state=3100000 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-556 [007] .... 620.536858: cpu_frequency: state=3300000 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-556 [007] .... 620.557857: cpu_frequency: state=3401000 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 669.591363: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 669.591939: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 669.591980: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] dN.. 669.591989: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> ...
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 670.201224: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 670.221975: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-556 [007] .... 670.222016: cpu_frequency: state=3300000 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 670.222026: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 670.234964: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> ...
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 670.801251: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 671.236046: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-556 [007] .... 671.236073: cpu_frequency: state=3100000 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 671.236112: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 671.393437: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> ...
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 671.401277: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 671.404083: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-556 [007] .... 671.404111: cpu_frequency: state=2900000 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 671.404125: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 671.404974: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> ...
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 671.501180: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 671.995414: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-556 [007] .... 671.995459: cpu_frequency: state=2800000 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 671.995469: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 671.996287: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> ...
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 672.001305: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 672.078374: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-556 [007] .... 672.078410: cpu_frequency: state=2600000 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 672.078419: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 672.158020: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-556 [007] .... 672.158040: cpu_frequency: state=2400000 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 672.158044: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 672.160038: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> ...
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 672.234557: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 672.237121: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-556 [007] .... 672.237174: cpu_frequency: state=2100000 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 672.237186: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 672.237778: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> ...
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 672.267902: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 672.269860: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-556 [007] .... 672.269906: cpu_frequency: state=1900000 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 672.269914: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 672.271902: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> ...
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 672.751342: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 672.823056: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-556 [007] .... 672.823095: cpu_frequency: state=1600000 cpu_id=7
>
> WITH
> ----
> <idle>-0 [007] dN.. 4380.928009: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-399 [007] .... 4380.949767: cpu_frequency: state=2000000 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-399 [007] .... 4380.969765: cpu_frequency: state=2200000 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-399 [007] .... 4381.009766: cpu_frequency: state=2500000 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-399 [007] .... 4381.029767: cpu_frequency: state=2600000 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-399 [007] .... 4381.049769: cpu_frequency: state=2800000 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-399 [007] .... 4381.069769: cpu_frequency: state=3000000 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-399 [007] .... 4381.089771: cpu_frequency: state=3100000 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-399 [007] .... 4381.109772: cpu_frequency: state=3400000 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-399 [007] .... 4381.129773: cpu_frequency: state=3401000 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 4428.226159: cpu_idle: state=1 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 4428.226176: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 4428.226181: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 4428.227177: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> ...
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 4428.551640: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 4428.649239: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-399 [007] .... 4428.649268: cpu_frequency: state=2800000 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 4428.649278: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 4428.689856: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> ...
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 4428.799542: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 4428.801683: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-399 [007] .... 4428.801748: cpu_frequency: state=1700000 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 4428.801761: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 4428.806545: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> ...
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 4429.051880: cpu_idle: state=4 cpu_id=7
> <idle>-0 [007] d... 4429.086240: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=7
> kworker/7:2-399 [007] .... 4429.086293: cpu_frequency: state=1600000 cpu_id=7
>
> Without the patch the CPU dropped to min frequency after 3.2s
> With the patch applied the CPU dropped to min frequency after 0.86s
>
> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 9 +++++++++
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> index 1347589..07dac72 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> @@ -74,6 +74,15 @@ static unsigned int cs_dbs_timer(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> if (cs_tuners->freq_step == 0)
> goto out;
>
> + if (policy_dbs->deferred_periods < UINT_MAX) {
Perhaps this all should be done only if we are going to decrease the frequency,
i.e. somewhere down than what you are proposing.
> + unsigned int freq_target = policy_dbs->deferred_periods *
> + get_freq_target(cs_tuners, policy);
> + if (requested_freq > freq_target)
> + requested_freq -= freq_target;
> + else
> + requested_freq = policy->min;
> + policy_dbs->deferred_periods = UINT_MAX;
> + }
> /*
> * If requested_freq is out of range, it is likely that the limits
> * changed in the meantime, so fall back to current frequency in that
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> index 642dd0f..0d498a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ unsigned int dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
> struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data;
> unsigned int ignore_nice = dbs_data->ignore_nice_load;
> - unsigned int max_load = 0;
> + unsigned int max_load = 0, deferred_periods = UINT_MAX;
> unsigned int sampling_rate, io_busy, j;
>
> /*
> @@ -163,8 +163,13 @@ unsigned int dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> * calls, so the previous load value can be used then.
> */
> load = j_cdbs->prev_load;
> - } else if (unlikely(time_elapsed > 2 * sampling_rate &&
> - j_cdbs->prev_load)) {
> + } else if (unlikely(time_elapsed > 2 * sampling_rate)) {
> + unsigned int periods = time_elapsed / sampling_rate;
> +
> + if (periods < deferred_periods)
> + deferred_periods = periods;
> +
> + if (j_cdbs->prev_load) {
> /*
You forgot to shift the below comment by a tab. Maybe just position the above
'if' statement after the comment.
> * If the CPU had gone completely idle and a task has
> * just woken up on this CPU now, it would be unfair to
> @@ -189,8 +194,9 @@ unsigned int dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> * 'time_elapsed' (as compared to the sampling rate)
> * indicates this scenario.
> */
> - load = j_cdbs->prev_load;
> - j_cdbs->prev_load = 0;
> + load = j_cdbs->prev_load;
> + j_cdbs->prev_load = 0;
> + }
> } else {
> if (time_elapsed >= idle_time) {
> load = 100 * (time_elapsed - idle_time) / time_elapsed;
> @@ -218,6 +224,8 @@ unsigned int dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> if (load > max_load)
> max_load = load;
> }
> + policy_dbs->deferred_periods = deferred_periods;
> +
> return max_load;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dbs_update);
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
> index ef1037e..48efeb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ struct policy_dbs_info {
> struct list_head list;
> /* Multiplier for increasing sample delay temporarily. */
> unsigned int rate_mult;
> + unsigned int deferred_periods;
> /* Status indicators */
> bool is_shared; /* This object is used by multiple CPUs */
> bool work_in_progress; /* Work is being queued up or in progress */
> --
> 2.7.4
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists