linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20161107180614.GR24166@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2016 10:06:14 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz_full is enabled

On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 05:08:59PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> ----- On Nov 3, 2016, at 1:49 PM, Paul E. McKenney paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:29:28AM -0600, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >> Userspace applications should be allowed to expect the membarrier system
> >> call with MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED command to issue memory barriers on
> >> nohz_full CPUs, but synchronize_sched() does not take those into
> >> account.
> >> 
> >> Given that we do not want unrelated processes to be able to affect
> >> real-time sensitive nohz_full CPUs, simply return ENOSYS when membarrier
> >> is invoked on a kernel with enabled nohz_full CPUs.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
> >> CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > 
> > Acked-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Hi Paul,
> 
> Do you plan to pick it up through your tree, or I should sent
> it directly to Linus ?

Your choice.  I believe that the original went some other way, but I
would be fine carrying this one.

							Thanx, Paul

> Thanks,
> 
> Mathieu
> 
> > 
> >> CC: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
> >> CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> >> CC: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
> >> CC: <stable@...r.kernel.org>	[3.10+]
> >> ---
> >>  kernel/membarrier.c | 4 ++++
> >>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/kernel/membarrier.c b/kernel/membarrier.c
> >> index 536c727..9f9284f 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/membarrier.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/membarrier.c
> >> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> >> 
> >>  #include <linux/syscalls.h>
> >>  #include <linux/membarrier.h>
> >> +#include <linux/tick.h>
> >> 
> >>  /*
> >>   * Bitmask made from a "or" of all commands within enum membarrier_cmd,
> >> @@ -51,6 +52,9 @@
> >>   */
> >>  SYSCALL_DEFINE2(membarrier, int, cmd, int, flags)
> >>  {
> >> +	/* MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED is not compatible with nohz_full. */
> >> +	if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
> >> +		return -ENOSYS;
> >>  	if (unlikely(flags))
> >>  		return -EINVAL;
> >>  	switch (cmd) {
> >> --
> >> 2.1.4
> 
> -- 
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> EfficiOS Inc.
> http://www.efficios.com
>