linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v7 09/11] scsi: ufs: connect to RPMB subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B5431750E@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2016 19:27:38 +0000
From:   "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
CC:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        "Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        "James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Arve Hj?nnev?g <arve@...roid.com>,
        "Michael Ryleev" <gmar@...gle.com>,
        Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
        Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@...eaurora.org>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 09/11] scsi: ufs: connect to RPMB subsystem

> 
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:53:12PM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > Register UFS RPMB LUN with the RPMB subsystem and provide
> > implementation for the RPMB access operations. RPMB partition is
> > accessed via a sequence of security protocol in and security protocol
> > out commands with UFS specific parameters. This multi step process is
> > abstracted into 4 basic RPMB commands.
> 
> This is a giant layering violation - the security protocol is not something up to
> the LLDD but the core code.
> 
> And honestly the idea of defintining a security protocol in the UFS spec is just
> as braindead.  If you care about this please take it up with T10 to get RPMB
> support into one of the core SCSI specs instead of a transport.

I  value your opinion but I'm not responsible for inventing RPMB 
and/or its  implementation storage devices (eMMC, UFC, NVMe), it's pretty much done deal out there in the wild. 
I'm just trying to provide common API above it.

Thanks
Tomas