linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] i2c: use an IRQ to report Host Notify events, not alert

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161107002034.GB1442@katana>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2016 01:20:35 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Cc:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] i2c: use an IRQ to report Host Notify events, not
 alert

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:10:40PM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> The current SMBus Host Notify implementation relies on .alert() to
> relay its notifications. However, the use cases where SMBus Host
> Notify is needed currently is to signal data ready on touchpads.
> 
> This is closer to an IRQ than a custom API through .alert().
> Given that the 2 touchpad manufacturers (Synaptics and Elan) that
> use SMBus Host Notify don't put any data in the SMBus payload, the
> concept actually matches one to one.

I see the advantages. The only question I have: What if we encounter
devices in the future which do put data in the payload? Can this
mechanism be extended to handle that?

> 
> Benefits are multiple:
> - simpler code and API: the client will just have an IRQ, and
>   nothing needs to be added in the adapter beside internally
>   enabling it.
> - no more specific workqueue, the threading is handled by IRQ core
>   directly (when required)
> - no more races when removing the device (the drivers are already
>   required to disable irq on remove)
> - simpler handling for drivers: use plain regular IRQs
> - no more dependency on i2c-smbus for i2c-i801 (and any other adapter)
> - the IRQ domain is created automatically when the adapter exports
>   the Host Notify capability
> - the IRQ are assign only if ACPI, OF and the caller did not assign
>   one already
> - the domain is automatically destroyed on remove
> - fewer lines of code (minus 20, yeah!)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>

Thanks for keeping at it!


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)