[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1478560460-3818619-1-git-send-email-ast@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 15:14:20 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH] tracing: ignore FTRACE_FL_DISABLED while walking dyn_ftrace records
ftrace_shutdown() checks for sanity of ftrace records
and if dyn_ftrace->flags is not zero, it will warn.
It can happen that 'flags' are set to FTRACE_FL_DISABLED at this point,
since some module was loaded, but before ftrace_module_enable()
cleared the flags for this module.
In other words the module.c is doing:
ftrace_module_init(mod); // calls ftrace_update_code() that sets flags=FTRACE_FL_DISABLED
... // here ftrace_shutdown() is called that warns, since
err = prepare_coming_module(mod); // didn't have a chance to clear FTRACE_FL_DISABLED
Fix it by ignoring disabled records.
It's similar to what __ftrace_hash_rec_update() is already doing.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 2050a7652a86..326498baab83 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -2763,7 +2763,7 @@ static int ftrace_shutdown(struct ftrace_ops *ops, int command)
struct dyn_ftrace *rec;
do_for_each_ftrace_rec(pg, rec) {
- if (FTRACE_WARN_ON_ONCE(rec->flags))
+ if (FTRACE_WARN_ON_ONCE(rec->flags & ~FTRACE_FL_DISABLED))
pr_warn(" %pS flags:%lx\n",
(void *)rec->ip, rec->flags);
} while_for_each_ftrace_rec();
--
2.8.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists