linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: merge as soon as possible when pcp alloc/free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20161107154532.e3573bc08324e24aad6d1e26@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2016 15:45:32 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
Cc:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        "'Kirill A . Shutemov'" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>,
        Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: merge as soon as possible when pcp alloc/free

On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 15:57:55 +0800 Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com> wrote:

> Usually the memory of android phones is very small, so after a long
> running, the fragment is very large. Kernel stack which called by
> alloc_thread_stack_node() usually alloc 16K memory, and it failed
> frequently.
> 
> However we have CONFIG_VMAP_STACK now, but it do not support arm64,
> and maybe it has some regression because of vmalloc, it need to
> find an area and create page table dynamically, this will take a short
> time.
> 
> I think we can merge as soon as possible when pcp alloc/free to reduce
> fragment. The pcp page is hot page, so free it will cause cache miss,
> I use perf to test it, but it seems the regression is not so much, maybe
> it need to test more. Any reply is welcome.

per-cpu pages may not be worth the effort on such systems - probably
benefit is small.  I discussed this with Mel a few years ago and I
think he did some testing, but I forget the results?

Anyway, if per-cpu pages are causing problems then perhaps we should
have a Kconfig option which simply eliminates them: free these pages
direct into the buddy.  If the resulting code is clean-looking and the
performance testing on small systems shows decent results then that
should address the issues you're seeing.