linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390: squash facilities_src.h into gen

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1478596703.29112.42.camel@tiscali.nl>
Date:   Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:18:23 +0100
From:   Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:     Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc:     Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        Sascha Silbe <silbe@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390: squash facilities_src.h into gen_facilities.c

On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 14:38 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 02:13:06PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/facilities.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> > +#ifndef __ASM_FACILITIES_H
> > +#define __ASM_FACILITIES_H
> > +
> > +#define FACILITIES_ALS \
> > +	_AC(IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_HAVE_MARCH_Z900_FEATURES), UL) << 0 |	/* N3 instructions */ \
> 
> So, this is wrong. It should be " << 63" to match the existing code.

Bother.

> > +#define FACILITIES_KVM \
> > +	_BITUL(0)  |	/* N3 instructions */ \
> > +	_BITUL(1)  |	/* z/Arch mode installed */ \
> > +	_BITUL(2)  |	/* z/Arch mode active */ \
> > +	_BITUL(3)  |	/* DAT-enhancement */ \
> > +	_BITUL(4)  |	/* idte segment table */ \
> > +	_BITUL(5)  |	/* idte region table */ \
> > +	_BITUL(6)  |	/* ASN-and-LX reuse */ \
> > +	_BITUL(7)  |	/* stfle */ \
> > +	_BITUL(8)  |	/* enhanced-DAT 1 */ \
> > +	_BITUL(9)  |	/* sense-running-status */ \
> > +	_BITUL(10) |	/* conditional sske */ \
> > +	_BITUL(13) |	/* ipte-range */ \
> > +	_BITUL(14)  	/* nonquiescing key-setting */ \
> > +	, \
> > +	_BITUL(9)  |	/* transactional execution */ \
> > +	_BITUL(11) |	/* access-exception-fetch/store indication */ \
> 
> And this is exactly what I want to avoid: start counting from zero again if
> we cross a double word. It _must_ read 73, 75, otherwise this becomes the
> unmaintainable and error prone mess we had before.
> 
> I just want a list with bit numbers and the rest must be created
> automatically.

This sounds like a can of worms. Better keep it closed.

Thanks,


Paul Bolle