linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Fix PDF builds on media documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161108075644.4c9404d9@vento.lan>
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2016 07:56:44 -0200
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
To:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Fix PDF builds on media documentation

Em Tue, 8 Nov 2016 07:19:38 -0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com> escreveu:

> Em Tue, 08 Nov 2016 11:04:55 +0200
> Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com> escreveu:
> 
> > On Tue, 08 Nov 2016, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com> wrote:  
> > > On Mon, 07 Nov 2016, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com> wrote:    
> > >> This series address a series of errors during PDF generation from
> > >> media documentation.    
> > >
> > > I'm missing patches 3-6 of this series, and so is the archive.    
> > 
> > I meant 4-6.  
> 
> Hmm... patchwork got patches 4 and 6, but patch 5 is missed:
> 	https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/LKML/list/?submitter=141
> 
> Weird. Perhaps another DDoS attack at the Internet infrastructure,
> affecting email delivers?
> 
> Patch 5 is just a GIF->PNG conversion patch:
> 	https://git.linuxtv.org/mchehab/experimental.git/commit/?h=pdf-fixes&id=8af9c8d33609fdb64ae9ecc66edd27719d16df62
> 
> I could try to resend, if you want, but perhaps vger doesn't like patches
> with binary changes on it.

Re-sent the rebased version, explicitly C/C you.

Regards,
Mauro