[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161108145652.GA12817@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 15:56:52 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] pci: add pci_irq_get_affinity_vector()
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:47:21AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Add a reverse-mapping function to return the interrupt vector for
> any CPU if interrupt affinity is enabled.
What's the use case of it?
Also as-is this won't work due to the non-affinity vectors that
have the affinity set to all cpus. It will get even worse if we have
to support things like virtio_net that have multiple interrupts per
CPU due to the send and receive virtqueues.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists