linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] firmware: arm_scpi: add support for legacy SCPI protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <28decdc3-6b86-924f-d3c1-9873a8cfce77@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2016 15:11:07 +0000
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] firmware: arm_scpi: add support for legacy SCPI
 protocol

On 08/11/16 14:51, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 10:52:03PM -0600, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> This is minor rework of the series[1] from Neil Armstrong's to support
>> legacy SCPI protocol to make DT bindings more generic and move out all
>> the platform specific bindings out of the generic binding document.
>
> Is this what would be in my HBI0282B Juno?
>

No, it's one on the AmLogic Meson GXBB platform. Juno never supported
that except that old firmware use it internally. By that I mean some
version of trusted firmware used legacy SCPI but they are generally
bundled together in fip, so you should not see any issue with upgrade.

> (Note: I only have the original firmware on the board, as the Linaro
> firmware drops are completely broken for it.)
>

I am currently trying to run Linaro 16.10 release, I don't see any issue
except network boot from UEFI which is known and reported.

I will go through your logs in detail and try to replicate your issue.
I assume you have tried replacing the entry contents of the uSD with the
release. I will start with that now.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep