[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161108170415.GM3117@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 18:04:15 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the
drm-intel tree
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:09:16PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Now, I know you're working on getting rid of this entirely for i915, but
> > what about that MSM driver? Will we continue to need it there, is
> > anybody actually maintaining that thing?
>
> Rob Clark is, and since he's a one-man gpu driver team with other
> responsibilities it might take even longer than for i915 :(
Fair enough. For my information, how much a of copy/paste job from i915
was that? Could he, in principle, copy/paste your changes to get rid of
this back into MSM without too much effort, or have things diverged
greatly since the initial copy/paste?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists