[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161108174005.mjxbvgbjjxmakhur@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:40:05 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@...esas.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Hiep Cao Minh <cm-hiep@...so.co.jp>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: rspi: avoid uninitialized variable access
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:20:50PM +0000, Chris Brandt wrote:
> Since I was CC-ed, I'll add in my opinion:
> While Geert already pointed out the spelling mistake (_in_or_our >> _in_or_out), since that function is only just for qspi versions, a better function name should have been "qspi_pio_transfer_in_or_out"
Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context. This allows
readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what
you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the
discussion is being addressed.
Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs at something
substantially less than 80 columns. Doing this makes your messages much
easier to read and reply to.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (456 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists