[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161108142157.68c7db7c@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 14:21:57 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][ATCH 3/3] syscalls: Remove start and number from
syscall_get_arguments() args
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 15:54:14 -0800
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> > From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> >
>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h
> > index e3c95e8e61c5..050891169b51 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h
>
> x86 part is:
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
>
> Although I wonder why this takes a task argument.
Thanks, although kbuild bot discovered a slight mistake:
} else {
# endif
*args++ = regs->di;
Should be:
} else
# endif
{
*args++ = regs->di;
I'll update, and also look at making it a struct.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists