[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161108212439.smukc7ayq7bvo6qd@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 22:24:39 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
linux-edac <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/MCE: Remove MCP_TIMESTAMP
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 10:14:04PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> And yes, you should spend the extra cycles. Adding a flags argument to
> mce_setup() and propagate it through the various callsites shouldn't be
> that hard and would make the stuff obvious instead of obfuscated.
Sure, that's already on my TODO. I want to take a look at it when I have
a quiet moment.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists