linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/72] 3.12.67-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d9d6794b-bd4f-529c-8616-9b3b2c218737@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2016 20:14:01 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     shuah.kh@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/72] 3.12.67-stable review

On 11/08/2016 07:40 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 11/07/2016, 06:16 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 11/07/2016 05:04 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.67 release.
>>> There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Wed Nov  9 14:03:48 CET 2016.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>
>> Build results:
>>     total: 128 pass: 127 fail: 1
>> Failed builds:
>>     um:defconfig
>>
>> Qemu test results:
>>     total: 85 pass: 85 fail: 0
>>
>> Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.
>>
>> Build error log for um:defconfig:
>>
>> ipc/sem.c: In function 'complexmode_tryleave':
>> ipc/sem.c:317:2: error: implicit declaration of function
>> 'smp_store_release'
>> ipc/sem.c: In function 'sem_lock':
>> ipc/sem.c:370:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_load_acquire'
>>
>> Culprit is commit a198951bf258 ("ipc/sem.c: fix complex_count vs. simple
>> op race"),
>> and reverting it fixes the problem. Copying the patch author for feedback.
>
> Oh, thanks!
>
> I backported this to fix the problem:
> commit 577f183acc88645eae116326cc2203dc88ea730c
> Author: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> Date:   Mon Dec 21 09:22:18 2015 +0200
>
>     x86/um: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
>
> Everything should be fine now, let's see the results :).
>

Yes, all ok now.

Guenter