[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161109085504.10799-1-andrew.shadura@collabora.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 09:55:04 +0100
From: Andrew Shadura <andrew.shadura@...labora.co.uk>
To: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] tools-powerpc: Return false instead of -1
From: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>
Returning a negative value for a boolean function seem to have the
undesired effect of returning true. require_paranoia_below() is a
boolean function, but the variable used to store the return value is an
integer, receiving -1 or 0. This patch convert rc to bool, replace -1
by false, and 0 by true.
This issue was found by the following Coccinelle semantic patch:
<smpl>
@@
identifier f, ret;
constant C;
typedef bool;
@@
bool f (...){
<+...
ret = -C;
...
* return ret;
...+>
}
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Shadura <andrew.shadura@...labora.co.uk>
---
tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/lib.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/lib.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/lib.c
index 8b992fa..5bf5dd4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/lib.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/lib.c
@@ -193,9 +193,9 @@ bool require_paranoia_below(int level)
long current;
char *end, buf[16];
FILE *f;
- int rc;
+ bool rc;
- rc = -1;
+ rc = false;
f = fopen(PARANOID_PATH, "r");
if (!f) {
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ bool require_paranoia_below(int level)
if (current >= level)
goto out_close;
- rc = 0;
+ rc = true;
out_close:
fclose(f);
out:
--
2.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists