[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1478681833-23397-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 17:57:13 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
jiangshanlai@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Avoid unnecessary contention of rcu node lock
It's unnecessary to try to print stacks of blocked tasks in the case
that ndetected == 0. Furthermore, calling rcu_print_detail_task_stall()
causes to acquire rnp locks as many times as the number of leaf nodes
plus one for root node. It's unnecessary at all in the case.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 287f468..ab2f743 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1374,6 +1374,9 @@ static void print_other_cpu_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long gpnum)
(long)rsp->gpnum, (long)rsp->completed, totqlen);
if (ndetected) {
rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(rsp);
+
+ /* Complain about tasks blocking the grace period. */
+ rcu_print_detail_task_stall(rsp);
} else {
if (READ_ONCE(rsp->gpnum) != gpnum ||
READ_ONCE(rsp->completed) == gpnum) {
@@ -1390,9 +1393,6 @@ static void print_other_cpu_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long gpnum)
}
}
- /* Complain about tasks blocking the grace period. */
- rcu_print_detail_task_stall(rsp);
-
rcu_check_gp_kthread_starvation(rsp);
panic_on_rcu_stall();
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists