lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161109104058.GB27196@packer-debian-8-amd64.digitalocean.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2016 05:40:58 -0500
From:   Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
To:     Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: module: When modifying a module's text ignore modules which are
 going away too

+++ Aaron Tomlin [07/11/16 11:46 +0000]:
>Hi Jessica,
>
>Any thoughts?

Hi Aaron,

Thanks for your patience as I slowly work through a large swath of emails :-)

Anyway, this looks fine to me. A going module's text should be (or
soon will be) rw anyway, so checking for going modules in the ro
case should be enough.

Rusty, if you give your ack for the second patch, I can apply both
patches to my modules-next branch. I'll also incorporate Steven's
suggestion for a comment explaining why going modules shouldn't be
converted to ro in this context.

Thanks,
Jessica

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ