linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.8 102/138] md: be careful not lot leak internal curr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20161109102849.596889796@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed,  9 Nov 2016 11:46:25 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Viswesh <viswesh.vichu@...il.com>,
        NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.8 102/138] md: be careful not lot leak internal curr_resync value into metadata. -- (all)

4.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>

commit 1217e1d1999ed6c9c1e1b1acae0a74ab70464ae2 upstream.

mddev->curr_resync usually records where the current resync is up to,
but during the starting phase it has some "magic" values.

 1 - means that the array is trying to start a resync, but has yielded
     to another array which shares physical devices, and also needs to
     start a resync
 2 - means the array is trying to start resync, but has found another
     array which shares physical devices and has already started resync.

 3 - means that resync has commensed, but it is possible that nothing
     has actually been resynced yet.

It is important that this value not be visible to user-space and
particularly that it doesn't get written to the metadata, as the
resync or recovery checkpoint.  In part, this is because it may be
slightly higher than the correct value, though this is very rare.
In part, because it is not a multiple of 4K, and some devices only
support 4K aligned accesses.

There are two places where this value is propagates into either
->curr_resync_completed or ->recovery_cp or ->recovery_offset.
These currently avoid the propagation of values 1 and 3, but will
allow 3 to leak through.

Change them to only propagate the value if it is > 3.

As this can cause an array to fail, the patch is suitable for -stable.

Reported-by: Viswesh <viswesh.vichu@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/md.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -8120,14 +8120,14 @@ void md_do_sync(struct md_thread *thread
 
 	if (!test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RESHAPE, &mddev->recovery) &&
 	    !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery) &&
-	    mddev->curr_resync > 2) {
+	    mddev->curr_resync > 3) {
 		mddev->curr_resync_completed = mddev->curr_resync;
 		sysfs_notify(&mddev->kobj, NULL, "sync_completed");
 	}
 	mddev->pers->sync_request(mddev, max_sectors, &skipped);
 
 	if (!test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &mddev->recovery) &&
-	    mddev->curr_resync > 2) {
+	    mddev->curr_resync > 3) {
 		if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_SYNC, &mddev->recovery)) {
 			if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery)) {
 				if (mddev->curr_resync >= mddev->recovery_cp) {