linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.8 043/138] timers: Prevent base clock corruption when forwarding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20161109102846.645300547@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed,  9 Nov 2016 11:45:26 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Ashton Holmes <scoopta@...il.com>,
        Michael Thayer <michael.thayer@...cle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Michal Necasek <michal.necasek@...cle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        knut.osmundsen@...cle.com, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
        rt@...utronix.de
Subject: [PATCH 4.8 043/138] timers: Prevent base clock corruption when forwarding

4.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

commit 6bad6bccf2d717f652d37e63cf261eaa23466009 upstream.

When a timer is enqueued we try to forward the timer base clock. This
mechanism has two issues:

1) Forwarding a remote base unlocked

The forwarding function is called from get_target_base() with the current
timer base lock held. But if the new target base is a different base than
the current base (can happen with NOHZ, sigh!) then the forwarding is done
on an unlocked base. This can lead to corruption of base->clk.

Solution is simple: Invoke the forwarding after the target base is locked.

2) Possible corruption due to jiffies advancing

This is similar to the issue in get_net_timer_interrupt() which was fixed
in the previous patch. jiffies can advance between check and assignement
and therefore advancing base->clk beyond the next expiry value.

So we need to read jiffies into a local variable once and do the checks and
assignment with the local copy.

Fixes: a683f390b93f("timers: Forward the wheel clock whenever possible")
Reported-by: Ashton Holmes <scoopta@...il.com>
Reported-by: Michael Thayer <michael.thayer@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Michal Necasek <michal.necasek@...cle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: knut.osmundsen@...cle.com
Cc: stern@...land.harvard.edu
Cc: rt@...utronix.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161022110552.253640125@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/time/timer.c |   23 ++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -878,7 +878,7 @@ static inline struct timer_base *get_tim
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
 static inline struct timer_base *
-__get_target_base(struct timer_base *base, unsigned tflags)
+get_target_base(struct timer_base *base, unsigned tflags)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	if ((tflags & TIMER_PINNED) || !base->migration_enabled)
@@ -891,25 +891,27 @@ __get_target_base(struct timer_base *bas
 
 static inline void forward_timer_base(struct timer_base *base)
 {
+	unsigned long jnow = READ_ONCE(jiffies);
+
 	/*
 	 * We only forward the base when it's idle and we have a delta between
 	 * base clock and jiffies.
 	 */
-	if (!base->is_idle || (long) (jiffies - base->clk) < 2)
+	if (!base->is_idle || (long) (jnow - base->clk) < 2)
 		return;
 
 	/*
 	 * If the next expiry value is > jiffies, then we fast forward to
 	 * jiffies otherwise we forward to the next expiry value.
 	 */
-	if (time_after(base->next_expiry, jiffies))
-		base->clk = jiffies;
+	if (time_after(base->next_expiry, jnow))
+		base->clk = jnow;
 	else
 		base->clk = base->next_expiry;
 }
 #else
 static inline struct timer_base *
-__get_target_base(struct timer_base *base, unsigned tflags)
+get_target_base(struct timer_base *base, unsigned tflags)
 {
 	return get_timer_this_cpu_base(tflags);
 }
@@ -917,14 +919,6 @@ __get_target_base(struct timer_base *bas
 static inline void forward_timer_base(struct timer_base *base) { }
 #endif
 
-static inline struct timer_base *
-get_target_base(struct timer_base *base, unsigned tflags)
-{
-	struct timer_base *target = __get_target_base(base, tflags);
-
-	forward_timer_base(target);
-	return target;
-}
 
 /*
  * We are using hashed locking: Holding per_cpu(timer_bases[x]).lock means
@@ -1025,6 +1019,9 @@ __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, un
 		}
 	}
 
+	/* Try to forward a stale timer base clock */
+	forward_timer_base(base);
+
 	timer->expires = expires;
 	/*
 	 * If 'idx' was calculated above and the base time did not advance