[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161109131041.GB12125@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 10:10:41 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] perf tools: Assorted fixes for hierarchy mode
Em Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:10:23PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf escreveu:
> On 2016.11.09 at 00:05 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
> > <markus@...ppelsdorf.de> wrote:
> > > On 2016.11.08 at 22:08 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > >> This patches fix problems in hierarchy output Markus reported some
> > >> time ago. The code is available on the 'perf/hierarchy-fix-v1' branch
> > >> in my tree:
> > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/namhyung/linux-perf.git
> > >> Any feedbacks are welcomed.
> > > By the way, I hope that:
> > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?h=perf/core&id=8a06b0be6507f97f3aa92ca814335b8b65fd3de2
> > > doesn't fall through the cracks.
> > What do you mean? It's already in the tip/perf/core so will be merged
> > to the mainline eventually.
> Ok. I was just wondering, because it sits there for two weeks already...
If you think something qualifies for perf/urgent, i.e. to go to a kernel
that is in -rc stage, v4.9-rc4 now, for instance, please point that out
and I'll consider it.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists