linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] perf tools: Assorted fixes for hierarchy mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161109131505.GD14552@x4>
Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2016 14:15:05 +0100
From:   Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] perf tools: Assorted fixes for hierarchy mode

On 2016.11.09 at 10:10 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:10:23PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf escreveu:
> > On 2016.11.09 at 00:05 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
> > > <markus@...ppelsdorf.de> wrote:
> > > > On 2016.11.08 at 22:08 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > >> This patches fix problems in hierarchy output Markus reported some
> > > >> time ago.  The code is available on the 'perf/hierarchy-fix-v1' branch
> > > >> in my tree:
> 
> > > >>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/namhyung/linux-perf.git
> 
> > > >> Any feedbacks are welcomed.
> 
> > > > By the way, I hope that:
> > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?h=perf/core&id=8a06b0be6507f97f3aa92ca814335b8b65fd3de2
> > > > doesn't fall through the cracks.
> 
> > > What do you mean?  It's already in the tip/perf/core so will be merged
> > > to the mainline eventually.
> 
> > Ok. I was just wondering, because it sits there for two weeks already...
> 
> If you think something qualifies for perf/urgent, i.e. to go to a kernel
> that is in -rc stage, v4.9-rc4 now, for instance, please point that out
> and I'll consider it.

Because "perf top --hierarchy" is new in 4.9, I think all fixes for that
feature qualify for perf/urgent by default.

-- 
Markus