[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161109141948.19244-7-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 14:19:38 +0000
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
Nate Watterson <nwatters@...eaurora.org>,
Prem Mallappa <prem.mallappa@...adcom.com>,
Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@....com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 06/16] drivers: iommu: arm-smmu-v3: convert struct device of_node to fwnode usage
Current ARM SMMU v3 driver rely on the struct device.of_node pointer for
device look-up and iommu_ops retrieval.
In preparation for ACPI probing enablement, convert the driver to use
the struct device.fwnode member for device and iommu_ops look-up so that
the driver infrastructure can be used also on systems that do not
associate an of_node pointer to a struct device (eg ACPI), making the
device look-up and iommu_ops retrieval firmware agnostic.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index e6f9b2d..fef9f60 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -1723,13 +1723,14 @@ static struct platform_driver arm_smmu_driver;
static int arm_smmu_match_node(struct device *dev, void *data)
{
- return dev->of_node == data;
+ return dev->fwnode == data;
}
-static struct arm_smmu_device *arm_smmu_get_by_node(struct device_node *np)
+static
+struct arm_smmu_device *arm_smmu_get_by_fwnode(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
{
struct device *dev = driver_find_device(&arm_smmu_driver.driver, NULL,
- np, arm_smmu_match_node);
+ fwnode, arm_smmu_match_node);
put_device(dev);
return dev ? dev_get_drvdata(dev) : NULL;
}
@@ -1765,7 +1766,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
master = fwspec->iommu_priv;
smmu = master->smmu;
} else {
- smmu = arm_smmu_get_by_node(to_of_node(fwspec->iommu_fwnode));
+ smmu = arm_smmu_get_by_fwnode(fwspec->iommu_fwnode);
if (!smmu)
return -ENODEV;
master = kzalloc(sizeof(*master), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -2634,7 +2635,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return ret;
/* And we're up. Go go go! */
- of_iommu_set_ops(dev->of_node, &arm_smmu_ops);
+ fwnode_iommu_set_ops(dev->fwnode, &arm_smmu_ops);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
if (pci_bus_type.iommu_ops != &arm_smmu_ops) {
pci_request_acs();
--
2.10.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists