linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: fix the bugs found in the hugetlb test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161109014234.GA20242@sha-win-210.asiapac.arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2016 09:42:36 +0800
From:   Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@....com>
To:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, <dwoods@...lanox.com>,
        <steve.capper@....com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <kaly.xin@....com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <nd@....com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: fix the bugs found in the hugetlb test

Hi Will & Catalin,

On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:36:43PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 02:09:09PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 01:44:37PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> > > (3) The test result in the Softiron and Juno-r1 boards:
> > > 
> > >    This detail test result shows below (both the "make func" & "make stress"):
> > > 
> > >     4KB granule:
> > > 
> > >         1.1) PTE + Contiguous bit : 4K x 16 = 64K (per huge page size)
> > >              Test result          : PASS
> > > 
> > >         1.2) PMD                  : 2M x  1 = 2M  (per huge page size)
> > >              Test result          : PASS
> > > 
> > >         1.3) PMD + Contiguous bit : 2M x 16 = 32M (per huge page size)
> > >              Test result          : PASS
> > > 
> > >     64KB granule:
> > > 
> > >         3.1) PTE + Contiguous bit : 64K x 32 = 2M (per huge page size)
> > >              Test result          : PASS
> > > 
> > >         3.2) PMD + Contiguous bit : 512M x 32 = 16G (per huge page size)
> > >              Test result          : no hardware to support this test
> > 
> > Don't we have support for single (non-contiguous) PMD huge page with 64K
> > pages (512M per huge page)? I gave it a try and it seems to work (though
> > without your patches applied ;)).
Yes, it should be okay. This patch set does not affect the the single
PMD huge page.

> > 
> > > Huang Shijie (2):
> > >   arm64: hugetlb: remove the wrong pmd check in find_num_contig()
> > >   arm64: hugetlb: fix the wrong address for several functions
> > 
> > For these patches:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Thanks you, Catalin.

> > 
> > I'm not sure whether Will plans to push them into 4.9. AFAICT, the
> > contiguous huge pages never worked properly, so we may not count it as a
> > regression but a new feature. If Will doesn't take them, I'll queue the
> > patches for 4.10.
> 
> Right, given that it's never worked and the failure only seems to crop up
> in synthetic testing, I think you can queue these for 4.10.
Okay. Thank for queue them for 4.10.

Thanks
Huang Shijie