lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2016 12:26:30 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] mfd: dt: Add bindings for the Aspeed SoC Display
 Controller (GFX)

On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 01:07:57AM +1030, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> The Aspeed SoC Display Controller is presented as a syscon device to
> arbitrate access by display and pinmux drivers. Video pinmux
> configuration on fifth generation SoCs depends on bits in both the
> System Control Unit and the Display Controller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-gfx.txt | 17 +++++++++++++++++

The register space can't be split to 2 nodes? 

>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-gfx.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-gfx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-gfx.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..aea5370efd97
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-gfx.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +* Device tree bindings for Aspeed SoC Display Controller (GFX)
> +
> +The Aspeed SoC Display Controller primarily does as its name suggests, but also
> +participates in pinmux requests on the g5 SoCs. It is therefore considered a
> +syscon device.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible:		"aspeed,ast2500-gfx", "syscon"

I think perhaps we should drop the syscon here and the driver should 
just register as a syscon.

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ