linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-iproc: support standard byte register accesses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2016 10:43:30 -0800
From:   Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
To:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>
Cc:     BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-iproc: support standard byte register
 accesses

Hi Adrian/Ulf,

Please ignore my comments in last email I sent out.  The v2 patch 
documentation matches the code and is good.  I am confusing myself 
between internal versions and external upstream versions of this code.

On 16-11-09 10:38 AM, Scott Branden wrote:
> Hi Adrian/Ulf,
>
> On 16-11-08 01:55 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 01/11/16 18:37, Scott Branden wrote:
>>> Add bytewise register accesses support for newer versions of IPROC
>>> SDHCI controllers.
>>> Previous sdhci-iproc versions of SDIO controllers
>>> (such as Raspberry Pi and Cygnus) only allowed for 32-bit register
>>> accesses.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@...adcom.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
>>
>> This is unchanged from V1 which I acked, so:
> I updated the binding name in the documentation but forgot to change it
> in this patch.  Now that Rob has ack'd the binding documentation I will
> send out an updated patch with binding string in the code matching the
> ack'd documentation.
Ignore this - PATCH v2 is good.
>
>>
>> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
>>
> With the minor change I will add your ack to the next version I send out.
>
> Thanks,
>  Scott