[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6602710.g0hLoND8U1@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 22:07:38 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Michael Zoran <mzoran@...wfest.net>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
stefan.wahren@...e.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
daniels@...labora.com, swarren@...dotorg.org, lee@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eric@...olt.net, noralf@...nnes.org,
weiyongjun1@...wei.com, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
popcornmix@...il.com, colin.king@...onical.com,
bobby.prani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vc04_services: rework ioctl code path
On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 12:37:27 PM CET Michael Zoran wrote:
> static long
> -vchiq_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +vchiq_ioctl_shutdown(VCHIQ_INSTANCE_T instance,
> + unsigned int cmd,
> + unsigned long arg) {
This does not use cmd or arg, so you can just drop both parameters.
In cases where the argument is actually used, better make it take
a pointer than an unsigned long argument, to save a conversion.
> + vchiq_log_trace(vchiq_arm_log_level,
> + "vchiq_ioctl(compat) - instance %pK, cmd %s, arg %lx",
> + instance,
> + ((_IOC_TYPE(cmd) == VCHIQ_IOC_MAGIC) &&
> + (ioctl_nr <= VCHIQ_IOC_MAX)) ?
> + ioctl_names[ioctl_nr] : "<invalid>", arg);
I'd suggest dropping the log_trace here.
> + if ((ioctl_nr > VCHIQ_IOC_MAX) ||
> + (vchiq_ioctl_compat_table[ioctl_nr].ioctl != cmd)) {
> + ret = -ENOTTY;
> + } else {
> + ret = vchiq_ioctl_compat_table[ioctl_nr].func(instance, cmd, arg);
> }
It's rather unusual to have a table like this, most drivers have a
simple switch/case statement. If you do a swapper like this, better
make it do something more and let it also pass the data as a kernel
pointer that you copy in and out of the kernel according to the
direction and size bits in the command number.
> @@ -104,6 +109,12 @@ typedef struct vchiq_service_base_struct {
> void *userdata;
> } VCHIQ_SERVICE_BASE_T;
>
> +struct vchiq_service_base32 {
> + int fourcc;
> + u32 callback;
> + u32 userdata;
> +};
Maybe better use compat_uptr_t along with compat_ptr() for passing
32-bit pointers. This will however require moving the struct definitions
into an #ifdef.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists