[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWox5ksj1xhJ6_n0wNA9j6veX0AzAE0V9Gs26Kvw5C_sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:22:13 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...bosch.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@....com>,
Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] soc: renesas: Identify SoC and register with the
SoC bus
Hi Ulf,
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 6:19:06 PM CET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 2:34:33 PM CET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> >> > And Samsung.
>> >> > Shall I create the immutable branch now?
>> >>
>> >> Arnd: are you happy with the new patches and changes?
>> >
>> > I still had some comments for patch 7, but that shouldn't stop
>> > you from creating a branch for the first three so everyone can
>> > build on top of that.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> What about patch [4/7]?
>> Haven't you received it? Your address was in the To-line for all 7 patches.
>
> Ok, I see it now, looks good. That should be included as well then.
Thanks, I've created the branch/tag :
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/geert/renesas-drivers.git
branch soc-device-match
signed tag soc-device-match-tag1
In the mean time, Ulf has applied the first two patches to mmc/next, on top
of lots of MMC work :-(
Ulf, as this is not only a dependency for Freescale/NXP (for sdhci-of-esdhc),
but also for Samsung and Renesas, would it still be possible to replace these
two commits
8b82c17a8ae533d6 base: soc: introduce soc_device_match() interface
6fa350172b098f0f base: soc: Check for NULL SoC device attributes
by a merge of soc-device-match-tag1?
You can find more info in the full thread at
https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg148558.html
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists