[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161110102741.2za5h56xpt2wt7tc@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:27:41 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rt@...utronix.de" <rt@...utronix.de>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/25] x86/mcheck: Do the init in one place
On 2016-11-10 11:22:22 [+0100], Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> Why on earth do we enable MCE stuff in identify_cpu() ?
so it happens asap.
Boris' mail in this thread:
|Uh, hm, I'm not sure about this: so the issue I see with this is that
|the more we're delaying the enabling or MCE reporting - and especially
|setting CR4[MCE] - the more we're increasing the window where a MCE
|during early boot will cause a shutdown. (This is what happens if
|CR4[MCE]=0b).
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists