[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161110141910.25095-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 14:19:10 +0000
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"John L . Hammond" <john.hammond@...el.com>,
Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@...il.com>,
lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lov: Fix signed wrap around when decrementing index 'i'
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Change predecrement compare to post decrement compare to avoid an
unsigned integer wrap-around comparisomn when decrementing in the while
loop.
Issue found with static analysis with CoverityScan, CID 1375917
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_ea.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_ea.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_ea.c
index 53db170..399298c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_ea.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_ea.c
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ struct lov_stripe_md *lsm_alloc_plain(u16 stripe_count)
return lsm;
err:
- while (--i >= 0)
+ while (i-- > 0)
kmem_cache_free(lov_oinfo_slab, lsm->lsm_oinfo[i]);
kvfree(lsm);
return NULL;
--
2.10.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists