linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: perf: Move ARMv8 PMU perf event definitions to asm/perf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161110171732.GA17134@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Nov 2016 17:17:32 +0000
From:   Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc:     Wei Huang <wei@...hat.com>, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, shannon.zhao@...aro.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, christoffer.dall@...aro.org,
        drjones@...hat.com, cov@...eaurora.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: perf: Move ARMv8 PMU perf event definitions
 to asm/perf_event.h

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 03:32:12PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 10/11/16 15:12, Wei Huang wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 11/10/2016 03:10 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> Hi Wei,
> >>
> >> On 09/11/16 19:57, Wei Huang wrote:
> >>> This patch moves ARMv8-related perf event definitions from perf_event.c
> >>> to asm/perf_event.h; so KVM code can use them directly. This also help
> >>> remove a duplicated definition of SW_INCR in perf_event.h.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Wei Huang <wei@...hat.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h | 161 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>  arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c      | 161 ------------------------------------
> >>>  2 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 162 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h
> >>> index 2065f46..6c7b18b 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h
> >>> @@ -46,7 +46,166 @@
> >>>  #define	ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_MASK	0xc800ffff	/* Mask for writable bits */
> >>>  #define	ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_EVENT	0xffff		/* Mask for EVENT bits */
> >>>  
> >>> -#define ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_EVENT_SW_INCR	0	/* Software increment event */
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * ARMv8 PMUv3 Performance Events handling code.
> >>> + * Common event types.
> >>> + */
> >>> +
> >>> +/* Required events. */
> >>> +#define ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_SW_INCR				0x00
> >>> +#define ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_L1D_CACHE_REFILL			0x03
> >>> +#define ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_L1D_CACHE				0x04
> >>> +#define ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_BR_MIS_PRED				0x10
> >>> +#define ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_CPU_CYCLES				0x11
> >>> +#define ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_BR_PRED				0x12
> >>
> >> In my initial review, I asked for the "required" events to be moved to a
> >> shared location. What's the rational for moving absolutely everything?
> > 
> > I did notice the phrase "required" in the original email. However I
> > think it is weird to have two places for a same set of PMU definitions.
> > Other developers might think these two are missing if they don't search
> > kernel files carefully.
> > 
> > If Will Deacon and you insist, I can move only two defs to perf_event.h,
> > consolidated with the 2nd patch into a single one.
> 
> My personal feeling is that only architected events should be in a
> public header. The CPU-specific ones are probably better kept private,
> as it is doubtful that other users would appear).
> 
> I'll leave it up to Will to decide, as all I want to avoid is the
> duplication of constants between the PMU and KVM code bases.

Yeah, just take the sets that you need (i.e. the architected events).

Also, check that it builds.

Will