linux-kernel - Re: Proposal: HAVE_SEPARATE_IRQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Nov 2016 18:37:10 +0100
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...tec.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org,
        WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com>,
        k@...ka.home.kg
Subject: Re: Proposal: HAVE_SEPARATE_IRQ_STACK?

Hi Matt,

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...tec.com> wrote:
>
> I don't see a reason not to do this - I'm taking a look into it.

Great thanks! This is good to hear. If you go into the arch/ directory
and simply grep for "irq_stack", you can pretty easily base your
implementation on a variety of other architectures' implementations.

Jason