linux-kernel - [PATCH 07/35] staging: lustre: lov: avoid infinite loop in lsm_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1478799065-24841-8-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 10 Nov 2016 12:30:37 -0500
From:   James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
        Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
        "John L. Hammond" <john.hammond@...el.com>,
        James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/35] staging: lustre: lov: avoid infinite loop in lsm_alloc_plain()

From: John L. Hammond <john.hammond@...el.com>

In lsm_alloc_plain() use a signed loop index to avoid an infinite loop
in the error path.

Signed-off-by: John L. Hammond <john.hammond@...el.com>
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6872
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/15644
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Eremin <dmitry.eremin@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_ea.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_ea.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_ea.c
index 218f275..ac0bf64 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_ea.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_ea.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ struct lov_stripe_md *lsm_alloc_plain(u16 stripe_count)
 	size_t oinfo_ptrs_size, lsm_size;
 	struct lov_stripe_md *lsm;
 	struct lov_oinfo     *loi;
-	unsigned int i;
+	int i;
 
 	LASSERT(stripe_count <= LOV_MAX_STRIPE_COUNT);
 
-- 
1.7.1