lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:17:26 -0800 From: Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com> To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de> Cc: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@...llahan.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>, David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "open list:USER-MODE LINUX (UML)" <user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>, "open list:USER-MODE LINUX (UML)" <user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net>, "open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and infrastructure)" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/7] x86/arch_prctl/64: Use SYSCALL_DEFINE2 to define sys_arch_prctl On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 10:39:50AM -0800, Kyle Huey wrote: > > <--- Add commit message here. > >> Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <khuey@...ehuey.com> >> --- >> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 3 ++- >> arch/x86/um/syscalls_64.c | 3 ++- >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > ... > >> void arch_switch_to(struct task_struct *to) >> { >> if ((to->thread.arch.fs == 0) || (to->mm == NULL)) >> return; >> >> base-commit: e3a00f68e426df24a5fb98956a1bd1b23943aa1e > > This looks like some tracking thing. It gets ignored by tools though... Yeah despite git format-patch generating it, git doesn't automatically honor it when applying patches. - Kyle
Powered by blists - more mailing lists