lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161110014908.GZ16026@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2016 17:49:08 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@...eaurora.org>,
        Trilok Soni <tsoni@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Return PTR_ERR when
 devm_clk_get fails

On 11/03, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote:
> When devm_clk_get fails for core clock, the failure was ignored
> and the core_clk was explicitly set to NULL so that other
> remaining clocks can be queried. However, now that we have a
> cleaner way of expressing the clock dependency, return failure
> when devm_clk_get fails for core clock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@...eaurora.org>

Why can't this be folded into the second patch? It seems
incorrect to allow it to silently work in patch 2 even though
we've flagged that clk as a requirement and then change that
behavior here.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ