[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611102226250.3501@nanos>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:27:32 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/46] perf/x86/intel/cmt: add intel_cmt pmu
On Sat, 29 Oct 2016, David Carrillo-Cisneros wrote:
> static int __init cmt_alloc(void)
> {
> cmt_l3_scale = boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_occ_scale;
> @@ -240,6 +339,7 @@ static int __init cmt_start(void)
> err = -ENOMEM;
> goto rm_online;
> }
> + event_attr_intel_cmt_llc_scale.event_str = str;
And yes, that string dup should happen with this patch and not detached in
the previous one.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists