lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:50:16 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Michael Zoran <mzoran@...wfest.net>
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, daniels@...labora.com,
        swarren@...dotorg.org, lee@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eric@...olt.net, noralf@...nnes.org,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, popcornmix@...il.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vc04_services: add vchiq_pagelist_info structure

On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:41:27AM -0800, Michael Zoran wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 11:03 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 01:10:35AM -0700, Michael Zoran wrote:
> > > The current dma_map_sg based implementation for bulk messages
> > > computes many offsets into a single allocation multiple times in
> > > both the create and free code paths.  This is inefficient,
> > > error prone and in fact still has a few lingering issues
> > > with arm64.
> > > 
> > > This change replaces a small portion of that inplementation with
> > > new code that uses a new struct vchiq_pagelist_info to store the
> > > needed information rather then complex offset calculations.
> > > 
> > > This improved implementation should be more efficient and easier
> > > to understand and maintain.
> > > 
> > > Tests Run(Both Pass):
> > > vchiq_test -p 1
> > > vchiq_test -f 10
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Zoran <mzoran@...wfest.net>
> > > ---
> > >  .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm.c           | 223
> > > +++++++++++----------
> > >  1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)
> > 
> > This doesn't apply to the tree anymore because of your previous patch
> > :(
> > 
> > Can you refresh it and resend?
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> OK, I resubmitted it.
> 
> Once this patch gets applied 64-bit should be in decent shape.  I'm not
> seeing any warnings or errors anymore and functional tests from a 64-
> bit OS look good.
> 
> The only remaining issue that I know of is that it needs a 32-bit
> compatibility layer for the ioctls when running a 32-bit OS(Raspbian)
> on top of a 64-bit kernel.

Ok, let's turn off BROKEN for the module, and enable CONFIG_TEST and see
if the 0-day bot barfs all over it or not :)

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ