lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 10:48:57 +0000 From: "liviu.dudau@....com" <liviu.dudau@....com> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> Cc: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Yuanzhichang <yuanzhichang@...ilicon.com>, "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>, "minyard@....org" <minyard@....org>, "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, "benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, "will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "xuwei (O)" <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>, Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>, "zourongrong@...il.com" <zourongrong@...il.com>, "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>, "kantyzc@....com" <kantyzc@....com>, "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>, "olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>, "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, "zhichang.yuan02@...il.com" <zhichang.yuan02@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] ARM64 LPC: LPC driver implementation on Hip06 Hi Arnd, On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 05:07:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday, November 10, 2016 3:36:49 PM CET Gabriele Paoloni wrote: > > > > Where should we get the range from? For LPC we know that it is going > > Work on anything that is not used by PCI I/O space, and this is > > why we use [0, PCIBIOS_MIN_IO] > > It should be allocated the same way we allocate PCI config space > segments. This is currently done with the io_range list in > drivers/pci/pci.c, which isn't perfect but could be extended > if necessary. Based on what others commented here, I'd rather > make the differences between ISA/LPC and PCI I/O ranges smaller > than larger. > > > > Your current version has > > > > > > if (arm64_extio_ops->pfout) \ > > > arm64_extio_ops->pfout(arm64_extio_ops->devpara,\ > > > addr, value, sizeof(type)); \ > > > > > > Instead, just subtract the start of the range from the logical > > > port number to transform it back into a bus-local port number: > > > > These accessors do not operate on IO tokens: > > > > If (arm64_extio_ops->start > addr || arm64_extio_ops->end < addr) > > addr is not going to be an I/O token; in fact patch 2/3 imposes that > > the I/O tokens will start at PCIBIOS_MIN_IO. So from 0 to PCIBIOS_MIN_IO > > we have free physical addresses that the accessors can operate on. > > Ah, I missed that part. I'd rather not use PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to refer to > the logical I/O tokens, the purpose of that macro is really meant > for allocating PCI I/O port numbers within the address space of > one bus. > > Note that it's equally likely that whichever next platform needs > non-mapped I/O access like this actually needs them for PCI I/O space, > and that will use it on addresses registered to a PCI host bridge. > > If we separate the two steps: > > a) assign a range of logical I/O port numbers to a bus Except that currently when we add ranges to io_range_list we don't have a bus number yet, because the parsing happens before the host bridge has been created. Maybe register_io_range() can take a bus number as an argument, but I'm not sure how we are going to use that in pci_pio_to_address() or pci_address_to_pio(). Best regards, Liviu > b) register a set of helpers for redirecting logical I/O > port to a helper function > > then I think the code will get cleaner and more flexible. > It should actually then be able to replace the powerpc > specific implementation. > > Arnd -- ==================== | I would like to | | fix the world, | | but they're not | | giving me the | \ source code! / --------------- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Powered by blists - more mailing lists