lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:07:29 -0800
From:   Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@...eaurora.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@...eaurora.org>,
        Trilok Soni <tsoni@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus
 clocks dependency

On 11/09/2016 09:55 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Wed 09 Nov 17:47 PST 2016, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
>> On 11/03, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
>>> index d79fecd..844e90d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
>>> @@ -380,32 +384,40 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_is_available);
>>>  static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>  {
>>>  	struct qcom_scm *scm;
>>> +	uint32_t clks;
>>
>> If this was unsigned long flags;
>>
>
> I did look at this too and could only find a mixture of ways people have
> done this. Isn't the correct type for this intptr_t?

That's true. There are lot of variations of how it's done. I had 
referred one of the gpio driver for this. I think it's safe to use 
unsigned long instead as Stephen suggested.

Btw I don't see intptr_t defined in include/linux/types.h.

Regards,
Sarang

>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
>>>  	int ret;
>>>
>>>  	scm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*scm), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>  	if (!scm)
>>>  		return -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>> -	scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "core");
>>> -	if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) {
>>> -		if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>>> -			return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk);
>>> +	clks = (uint32_t)((uintptr_t)of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev));
>>
>> then this could just be a cast to unsigned long?
>>
>>> +	if (clks & SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK) {
>>> +		scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "core");
>>> +		if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) {
>>> +			if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>>> +				return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk);
>>>
>>> -		scm->core_clk = NULL;
>>> +			scm->core_clk = NULL;
>>> +		}
>>>  	}
>>
>> --
>> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
>> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project


-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ