[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67166adf-5a89-3283-8a16-9a0a9a57e770@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 16:36:37 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net, knaack.h@....de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jon.Brenner@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/28] staging: iio: tsl2583: updated code comment to
match what the code does
On 10/11/16 09:25, Brian Masney wrote:
> If channel 0 does not have any data, then the code sets the lux to zero.
> The corresponding comment says that the last value is returned. This
> updates the comment to correctly reflect what the code does.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
Better perhaps to just return an error, -EAGAIN perhaps?
I'm not sure why it would not give a value.
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2583.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2583.c b/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2583.c
> index 52a39a6..390ff8b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2583.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2583.c
> @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static int tsl2583_get_lux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> goto return_max;
>
> if (!ch0) {
> - /* have no data, so return LAST VALUE */
> + /* have no data, so return 0 */
> ret = 0;
> chip->als_cur_info.lux = 0;
> goto done;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists