linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Block fixes for 4.9-rc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzjUTzokY8MHYXFPhr0W037Qzhu1EchGoAkkFUgrkV+CA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Nov 2016 16:45:32 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Cc:     "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Block fixes for 4.9-rc

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> Three small (really, one liners all of them!) fixes that should go into
> this series:

What about the aoeblk one? That seems to have come in with a tester
lately. From your original email:

 "I'm wondering if this is bio iteration breakage. aoeblk does this weird
  inc/dec of page counts, which should not be needed. At least others
  would be hit by this as well. In any case, should suffice for a test,
  before we look further. Can anyone test with this debug patch?"

Anyway, that bug seems to have been around forever and I'm not seeing
a lot of complaints, but I thought I'd ask.

Your oneliners pulled. Except when I pull, I don't actually get this one:

    Matias Bjørling (1):
          lightnvm: invalid offset calculation for lba_shift

but since you know how very deeply I care about lighnvm, I'm not
finding it in myself to worry about why that one was missing.

               Linus