[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1478987619-7716-1-git-send-email-waltfeasel@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 16:53:39 -0500
From: Walt Feasel <waltfeasel@...il.com>
To: markh@...pro.net
Cc: lidza.louina@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Walt Feasel <waltfeasel@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] [STYLE 1/2]staging:dgnc:dgnc_driver.h block comment modifications
Modified block comments for style consistency
Signed-off-by: Walt Feasel <waltfeasel@...il.com>
---
drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
index 5becb37..03fc58e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_cts_flow_control(struct channel_t *ch)
/* Turn off auto Xon flow control */
efr &= ~UART_17158_EFR_IXON;
- /* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
+ /*
+ * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
* out before setting it
*/
writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -145,7 +146,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_rts_flow_control(struct channel_t *ch)
ier &= ~UART_17158_IER_XOFF;
efr &= ~UART_17158_EFR_IXOFF;
- /* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
+ /*
+ * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
* out before setting it
*/
writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -185,7 +187,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_ixon_flow_control(struct channel_t *ch)
/* Turn on auto Xon flow control */
efr |= (UART_17158_EFR_ECB | UART_17158_EFR_IXON);
- /* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
+ /*
+ * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
* out before setting it
*/
writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -225,7 +228,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_ixoff_flow_control(struct channel_t *ch)
ier |= UART_17158_IER_XOFF;
efr |= (UART_17158_EFR_ECB | UART_17158_EFR_IXOFF);
- /* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
+ /*
+ * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
* out before setting it
*/
writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -268,7 +272,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_no_input_flow_control(struct channel_t *ch)
else
efr &= ~(UART_17158_EFR_ECB | UART_17158_EFR_IXOFF);
- /* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero
+ /*
+ * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero
* it out before setting it
*/
writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -308,7 +313,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_no_output_flow_control(struct channel_t *ch)
else
efr &= ~(UART_17158_EFR_ECB | UART_17158_EFR_IXON);
- /* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
+ /*
+ * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
* out before setting it
*/
writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -413,7 +419,8 @@ static inline void neo_parse_isr(struct dgnc_board *brd, uint port)
/* Read data from uart -> queue */
neo_copy_data_from_uart_to_queue(ch);
- /* Call our tty layer to enforce queue
+ /*
+ * Call our tty layer to enforce queue
* flow control if needed.
*/
spin_lock_irqsave(&ch->ch_lock, flags);
@@ -438,7 +445,8 @@ static inline void neo_parse_isr(struct dgnc_board *brd, uint port)
* one it was, so we can suspend or resume data flow.
*/
if (cause == UART_17158_XON_DETECT) {
- /* Is output stopped right now, if so,
+ /*
+ * Is output stopped right now, if so,
* resume it
*/
if (brd->channels[port]->ch_flags & CH_STOP) {
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists