lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161113050706.GA19995@x1>
Date:   Sun, 13 Nov 2016 13:07:06 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org, Vincent.Wan@....com, dyoung@...hat.com,
        xlpang@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] Fix kdump faults on system with amd iommu

On 11/10/16 at 12:52pm, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi Baoquan,
> 
> thanks for working on this, really appreciated!
> 
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 07:37:11PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > This is v6 post. 
> > 
> > The principle of the fix is similar to intel iommu. Just defer the assignment
> > of device to domain to device driver init. But there's difference than
> > intel iommu. AMD iommu create protection domain and assign device to
> > domain in iommu driver init stage. So in this patchset I just allow the
> > assignment of device to domain in software level, but defer updating the
> > domain info, especially the pte_root to dev table entry to device driver
> > init stage.
> 
> I recently talked with the IOMMU guys from AMD about whether it is safe
> to update the device-table pointer while the iommu is enabled. It turns
> out that device-table pointer update is split up into two 32bit writes
> in the IOMMU hardware. So updating it while the IOMMU is enabled could
> have some nasty side effects.
> 
> The only way to work around this is to allocate the device-table
> below 4GB, but that needs more low-mem then in the kdump kernel. So some
> adjustments are needed there too. Anyway, can you add that to your
> patch-set?

Yes, sure. Seems this is the only way to work around the 64bit address
being split up into two times of 32bit writes into IOMMU hardware risk.

I guess we need add a GFP_DMA32 flag when allocate pages for
amd_iommu_dev_table in kdump kernel. And better add a note in kdump.txt.
I have been told on some big advanced servers they don't need low mem
reseved at all with the help of hardware iommu. Now server with amd
iommu hardware have to be exceptional.

Thanks
Baoquan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ