[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1479136348-30706-1-git-send-email-michael@walle.cc>
Date:   Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:12:27 +0100
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        yangbo lu <yangbo.lu@...escale.com>,
        Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Subject: [PATCH v3] mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: fixup PRESENT_STATE read
Since commit 87a18a6a5652 ("mmc: mmc: Use ->card_busy() to detect busy
cards in __mmc_switch()") the ESDHC driver is broken:
  mmc0: Card stuck in programming state! __mmc_switch
  mmc0: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card
Since this commit __mmc_switch() uses ->card_busy(), which is
sdhci_card_busy() for the esdhc driver. sdhci_card_busy() uses the
PRESENT_STATE register, specifically the DAT0 signal level bit. But the
ESDHC uses a non-conformant PRESENT_STATE register, thus a read fixup is
required to make the driver work again.
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Fixes: 87a18a6a5652 ("mmc: mmc: Use ->card_busy() to detect busy cards in __mmc_switch()")
---
v3:
 - explain the bits in the comments
 - use bits[19:0] from the original value, all other will be taken from the
   fixup value.
v2:
 - use lower bits of the original value (that was actually a typo)
 - add fixes tag
 - fix typo
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
index fb71c86..74cf3b1 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
@@ -66,6 +66,19 @@ static u32 esdhc_readl_fixup(struct sdhci_host *host,
 			return ret;
 		}
 	}
+	/*
+	 * The DAT[3:0] line signal levels and the CMD line signal level are
+	 * not compatible with standard SDHC register. The line signal levels
+	 * DAT[7:0] are at bits 31:24 and the line signal level is at bit 23.
+	 * All other bits are the same as in the standard SDHC register.
+	 */
+	if (spec_reg == SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE) {
+		ret = value & 0x000fffff;
+		ret |= (value >> 4) & SDHCI_DATA_LVL_MASK;
+		ret |= (value << 1) & 0x01000000;
+		return ret;
+	}
+
 	ret = value;
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
