[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161114155222.GZ2078@8bytes.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:52:23 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
Nate Watterson <nwatters@...eaurora.org>,
Prem Mallappa <prem.mallappa@...adcom.com>,
Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@....com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/16] drivers: iommu: make of_iommu_set/get_ops() DT
agnostic
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:00:47PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> If we've already made the decision to move away from bus ops, I don't
> see that it makes sense to deliberately introduce new dependencies on
> them. Besides, as it stands, this patch literally implements "tell the
> iommu-core which hardware-iommus exist in the system and a seperate
> iommu_ops ptr for each of them" straight off.
Not sure which code you are looking at, but as I see it we have only
per-device iommu-ops now (with this patch). That is different from
having core-visible hardware-iommu instances where devices could link
to.
Also the rest of iommu-core code still makes use of the per-bus ops. The
per-device ops are only used for the of_xlate fn-ptr.
Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists