[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1479147466.6544.21.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:17:46 -0800
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 14 (drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c)
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 09:48 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 11/13/16 23:23, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20161111:
> >
>
> on i386, when CONFIG_ACPI is not enabled:
>
> ../drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c: In function 'copy_cpu_funcs':
> ../drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:1798:2: error: too few arguments to
> function 'intel_pstate_use_acpi_profile'
> intel_pstate_use_acpi_profile();
> ^
> ../drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:1782:20: note: declared here
> static inline void intel_pstate_use_acpi_profile(struct pstate_funcs
> *funcs)
>
^
[PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: fix intel_pstate_use_acpi_profile helper
from Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
fixes this.
But I am resubmitting the original patch as this is a compile issue.
Thanks,
Srinivas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists