linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] v4l: Add signal lock status to source change events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <de4a622c-0d2b-0233-3f82-958a16319656@mentor.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Nov 2016 11:19:08 -0800
From:   Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@...tor.com>
To:     Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>, <lars@...afoo.de>
CC:     <mchehab@...nel.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] v4l: Add signal lock status to source change
 events



On 11/14/2016 03:36 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 08/03/2016 08:03 PM, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
>> Add a signal lock status change to the source changes bitmask.
>> This indicates there was a signal lock or unlock event detected
>> at the input of a video decoder.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@...tor.com>
>> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> v4:
>> - converted to rst from DocBook
>>
>> v3: no changes
>> v2: no changes
>> ---
>>   Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-dqevent.rst | 9 +++++++++
>>   Documentation/media/videodev2.h.rst.exceptions  | 1 +
>>   include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h                  | 1 +
>>   3 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-dqevent.rst b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-dqevent.rst
>> index 73c0d5b..7d8a053 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-dqevent.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-dqevent.rst
>> @@ -564,6 +564,15 @@ call.
>>   	  an input. This can come from an input connector or from a video
>>   	  decoder.
>>   
>> +    -  .. row 2
>> +
>> +       -  ``V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_LOCK_STATUS``
>> +
>> +       -  0x0002
>> +
>> +       -  This event gets triggered when there is a signal lock or
>> +	  unlock detected at the input of a video decoder.
>> +
>>   
>>   Return Value
>>   ============
>> diff --git a/Documentation/media/videodev2.h.rst.exceptions b/Documentation/media/videodev2.h.rst.exceptions
>> index 9bb9a6c..f412cc8 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/media/videodev2.h.rst.exceptions
>> +++ b/Documentation/media/videodev2.h.rst.exceptions
>> @@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ replace define V4L2_EVENT_CTRL_CH_FLAGS ctrl-changes-flags
>>   replace define V4L2_EVENT_CTRL_CH_RANGE ctrl-changes-flags
>>   
>>   replace define V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_RESOLUTION src-changes-flags
>> +replace define V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_LOCK_STATUS src-changes-flags
>>   
>>   replace define V4L2_EVENT_MD_FL_HAVE_FRAME_SEQ v4l2-event-motion-det
>>   
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h b/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h
>> index 724f43e..08a153f 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h
>> @@ -2078,6 +2078,7 @@ struct v4l2_event_frame_sync {
>>   };
>>   
>>   #define V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_RESOLUTION		(1 << 0)
>> +#define V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_LOCK_STATUS		(1 << 1)
>>   
>>   struct v4l2_event_src_change {
>>   	__u32 changes;
>>
> Quoting from an old (July) conversation about this:
>
>>>> I'm not entirely sure I like this. Typically losing lock means that this event
>>>> is triggered with the V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_RESOLUTION flag set, and userspace has
>>>> to check the new timings etc., which will fail if there is no lock anymore.
>>>>
>>>> This information is also available through ENUMINPUT.
>>>>
>>>> I would need to know more about why you think this is needed, because I don't
>>>> see what this adds.
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> At least on the ADV718x, a source resolution change (from an
>> autodetected video
>> standard change) and a signal lock status change are distinct events.
>> For example
>> there can be a temporary loss of input signal lock without a change in
>> detected
>> input video standard/resolution.
> OK, but what can the application do with that event? If the glitch didn't
> affect the video, then it is pointless.

Hi Hans, that's just it, for i.mx6 it does affect video. On i.mx6 a 
temporary
loss of signal from the adv7180 often results in a "split image", or rolling
image from captured frame to the next, and the only way to recover
from this failure is to restart the pipeline (stream off -- stream on). So
the application needs to be informed of this temporary loss of signal
event in order to restart streaming.


>
> If the lock is lost, then normally you loose video as well. If not, then
> applications are not interested in the event.

Yes, the lost lock causes a temporary or permanent loss of video,
but with no other indications from the adv7180 (such as a detected
video standard change). And on i.mx6, the lost lock often (actually
usually) causes a split or rolling image.

Steve